Discomfort-Induced Approach in Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation | ||
University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USAAruin Alexander S* | ||
Corresponding Author : | Aruin Alexander S, Ph.D Professor, Department of Physical Therapy (MC 898) University of Illinois at Chicago 1919 W. Taylor St., Chicago, IL, USA Tel: (312)355-0904 Fax: (312)996-4583 E-mail: aaruin@uic.edu | |
Received November 15, 2012; Accepted November 19, 2012; Published November 23, 2012 | ||
Main goals of rehabilitation are to help patients to reach the fullest physical, physiological, social, vocational and avocational potential consistent with their level of impairment, desires and life plans [1]. Rehabilitation involves medical, social, educational, and vocational measures used to optimize neurologic recovery, teach compensatory strategies for residual deficits, and teach Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and skills required for community living [2]. The majority of rehabilitation approaches that involve physical therapy are based on providing a patient with a positive re-enforcement of the patient’s performance by the physical therapist who conducts the treatment or a by a computerized device used in rehabilitation. Thus, positive feedback is used in gait re-education of individuals with Parkinson Disease [3], in improving of pointing movements in individuals with stroke [4], in enhancement of postural control in individuals with traumatic brain injury and cerebrovascular accident [5]. Such positive re-enforcement helps a patient to focus on the quality of the produced movement, ambulation, or the body posture. While the positive re-enforcement approach is extensively used in rehabilitation one can ask a question of whether rehabilitation based on using a positive feedback is the most efficient (and the only) way of restoring the lost ability to perform daily tasks or learning new movements and skills. We contend that the rehabilitation of patients could also be efficient when they are subjected to a discomfort leading to a need to overcome it. The support for the above statement comes from a number of studies that use a negative feedback to improve the patient’s body posture, gait pattern, or use of his/her affected extremity. Among them is the Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CI) therapy that involves constraining movements of the less-affected arm with a sling while intensively training use of the more-affected arm [6]. While the literature reports the common therapeutic factor in all CI Therapy techniques as inducing concentrated, repetitive practice of use of the more-affected limb, we argue that CI therapy also creates a discomfort due to inability of a patient to use the less affected arm. Such a discomfort could also serve as a negative feedback that promotes the use of the affected upper extremity. The CI Therapy approach has been applied successfully to treatment of the upper extremities in patients with chronic and subacute CVA [6], patients with chronic traumatic brain injury [7], for the lower limb of patients with multiple sclerosis [8], and individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury and fractured hip [9]. The approach has recently been extended to focal hand dystonia of musicians and phantom limb pain [10]. Negative feedback has been used in enhancement of ambulation in individuals with stroke who demonstrated narrow base of support during stance and gait. The feedback was provided in the form of an auditory signal (a beep) accompanying each step performed with a narrow distance between the feet [11]. Such a feedback was annoying to the patients so they tried to avoid receiving a beep and as a result improved their step width to a larger degree as compared to the group of patients that were not provided with such a negative feedback [12]. Weakness of abdominal muscles is one of the factors leading to low back pain [13] and specific stabilization exercises have been recommended [14]. A method and device for exercising the abdominal muscles was developed, based on alleviating the induced discomfort [15]. The device includes a miniature vibrator and an electrical switch attached to the belt and is positioned facing the abdominal wall. When the stomach is flat the switch activates a vibration of the abdominal muscles. To avoid the discomfort associated with vibration, the user periodically flexes abdominal muscles thus exercising them. Weight bearing asymmetry and impaired balance are common in individuals with stroke-related hemi paresis [16-19]. Symmetrical stance and weight bearing has been recognized as a predictor of the ability to ambulate [20,21], and it was shown that achieving symmetry of weight bearing is an important goal of rehabilitation and fall prevention [22]. Compelled Body-Weight Shift (CBWS) therapy, which involves lifting the non-affected lower extremity through the use of a shoe insert on the healthy side over a period of several weeks, can also be considered as a discomfort-induced therapy. Indeed, the lift forces loading the affected limb during treatment and daily activities (and as such creates discomfort that the patient wants to avoid). A series of studies showed that the CBWS therapy improves the symmetry of weight bearing and the velocity of gait in individuals with acute and chronic stroke [23-25]. Recent studies in individuals post-stroke have shown that walking on a split-belt treadmill led to short-term improvements in step length asymmetry [26,27]. Walking on the split-belt treadmill (with the belts moving at two different speeds) exaggerates the participants’ step length asymmetry thus augmenting their “error”. This error augmentation is critical because it provides the nervous system with a cue to correct the asymmetry [28]. It is quite possible that walking on the split-belt treadmill may also be associated with a discomfort that contributes to the improvement in the symmetry of gait. While the improvements in asymmetry are brief, and the individual with stroke returns to the baseline asymmetry after several minutes of over ground or treadmill walking [26,27], these studies demonstrate the capacity of individuals with stroke to produce a more symmetric walking pattern. The available information suggests that negative feedback and discomfort-induced approaches could be effective tools in physical therapy and rehabilitation. Future studies focused on development of new rehabilitation techniques that are based on using a discomfortinduced approach are needed. References
- DeLisa JA, Gans BM (2001) Rehabilitation medicine: principles and practice. (3rdedn), Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia.
- Harvey R, Macko R, Stein J, Richard Zorowitz,Winstein C (2008) Stroke recovery and rehabilitation: Demos Medical, New York.
- Herman T, Giladi N, Gruendlinger L, Hausdorff JM (2007) Six weeks of intensive treadmill training improves gait and quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88: 1154-1158.
- Subramanian S, Knaut LA, Beaudoin C, McFadyen BJ, Feldman AG, et al. (2007) Virtual reality environments for post-stroke arm rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 4: 20.
- Betker AL, Szturm T, Moussavi ZK, Nett C (2006) Video game-based exercises for balance rehabilitation: a single-subject design. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87: 1141-1149.
- Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R (1999) Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation--a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev 36: 237-251.
- Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB (1989) Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 104: 125-132.
- Mark VW, Taub E, Uswatte G, Bashir K, Cutter GR, et al. (2012) Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for the Lower Extremities in Multiple Sclerosis: Case Series with 4-Year Follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
- Mark VW, Taub E (2004) Constraint-induced movement therapy for chronic stroke hemiparesis and other disabilities. Restor Neurol Neurosci 22: 317-336.
- Weiss T, Miltner WH, Adler T, Brückner L, Taub E (1999) Decrease in phantom limb pain associated with prosthesis-induced increased use of an amputation stump in humans. Neurosci Lett 272: 131-134.
- Aruin A (2001) Apparatus and method for assessment and feedback training of step with coordination, USA.
- Aruin AS, Hanke TA, Sharma A (2003) Base of support feedback in gait rehabilitation. Int J Rehabil Res 26: 309-312.
- Stokes IA, Gardner-Morse MG, Henry SM (2011) Abdominal muscle activation increases lumbar spinal stability: analysis of contributions of different muscle groups. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 26: 797-803.
- Richardson C, Jull G, Hodges P, Hides J (2004) Therapeutic Exercise for Spinal Segmental Stabilization in Low Back Pain. (2ndedn), Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia.
- Aruin A, Raitsin L (1998) Method and device for exercising the abdominal muscles, USA.
- Bohannon RW, Larkin PA (1985) Lower extremity weight bearing under various standing conditions in independently ambulatory patients with hemiparesis. Phys Ther 65: 1323-1325.
- Eng JJ, Chu KS (2002) Reliability and comparison of weight-bearing ability during standing tasks for individuals with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83: 1138-1144.
- Rodriguez GM, Aruin AS (2002) The effect of shoe wedges and lifts on symmetry of stance and weight bearing in hemiparetic individuals. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83: 478-482.
- Tessem S, Hagstrøm N, Fallang B (2007) Weight distribution in standing and sitting positions, and weight transfer during reaching tasks, in seated stroke subjects and healthy subjects. Physiother Res Int 12: 82-94.
- Nichols DS (1997) Balance retraining after stroke using force platform biofeedback. Phys Ther 77: 553-558.
- Walker C, Brouwer BJ, Culham EG (2000) Use of visual feedback in retraining balance following acute stroke. Phys Ther 80: 886-895.
- Sackley CM (1991) Falls, sway, and symmetry of weight-bearing after stroke. Int Disabil Stud 13: 1-4.
- Aruin A, Rao N, Sharma A, Chaudhuri G (2012) Compelled Body-Weight Shift Approach in Rehabilitation of Individuals with Chronic Stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 19: 556-563
- Aruin AS, Hanke T, Chaudhuri G, Harvey R, Rao N (2000) Compelled weightbearing in persons with hemiparesis following stroke: the effect of a lift insert and goal-directed balance exercise. J Rehabil Res Dev 37: 65-72.
- Mohapatra S, Eviota A, Ringquist K, Muthukrishnan S, Aruin A (2012) Compelled Body Weight Shift Technique to Facilitate Rehabilitation of Individuals with Acute Stroke, ISRN Rehabilitation.
- Reisman DS, Wityk R, Silver K, Bastian AJ (2007) Locomotor adaptation on a split-belt treadmill can improve walking symmetry post-stroke. Brain 130: 1861-1872.
- Reisman DS, Wityk R, Silver K, Bastian AJ (2009) Split-belt treadmill adaptation transfers to overground walking in persons poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23: 735-744.
- Reisman DS, McLean H, Bastian AJ (2010) Split-belt treadmill training poststroke: a case study. J Neurol Phys Ther 34: 202-207.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário