Use of a Mechanical Massage Technique in the Treatment of Fibromyalgia: A Preliminary Study
Presented as an abstract to the 6th World Congress on Myofascial Pain and Fibromyalgia, July 18, 2004, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
Gordon C, Emiliozzi C, Zartarian M. Use of a mechanical massage technique in the treatment of fibromyalgia: a preliminary study.
Objective
To investigate how a mechanical massage technique (LPG technique) could contribute to the treatment of fibromyalgia.
Design
Feasibility study.
Setting
A single center.
Participants
Ten women having a preexisting diagnosis of fibromyalgia based on American College of Rheumatology criteria were enrolled.
Intervention
Subjects received a total of 15 sessions of mechanical massage administered by a physical therapist once a week.
Main Outcome Measures
The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire and a physical examination scoring tender points (number, pain intensity). Evaluations were conducted at the screening visit, after 7 sessions (V7), and after completion of 15 sessions (V15).
Results
Most of the parameters (pain intensity, physical function, number of tender points) showed a significant improvement at V15 compared with screening.
Conclusions
The findings suggest the possibility that the studied intervention might be associated with positive outcomes in women with fibromyalgia, and support the need for a controlled clinical trial to determine its efficacy.
FIBROMYALGIA IS AN ENIGMATIC syndrome characterized by chronic, widespread pain along with tender points, fatigue, sleep disturbances, abnormal stress response, and tension headaches. One of the most difficult aspects of fibromyalgia is the lack of radiologic, biologic, or genetic signs. Clinical criteria for diagnosis of fibromyalgia have been developed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR).1 Although the pathophysiologic mechanisms of fibromyalgia are not clear, treatments of fibromyalgia must target disease consequences and also break the vicious circle of pain, anxiety, sleep disturbances, and muscular exhaustion. Multidisciplinary treatments combining different approaches, including drug therapy, acupuncture, and connective tissue massage,2, 3, 4, 5 may have the best overall effectiveness.
The LPG technique is an original noninvasive technique, consisting of a delicate and reproducible mechanical massageawith claims such as relief of minor muscle aches and pains, relaxation of muscle spasms, relief of delayed-onset muscle soreness, and increase in blood flow.6 A single-center feasibility study was carried out to investigate whether this mechanical massage technique could be helpful in treating fibromyalgia.
Methods
Population and Treatment
At inclusion, eligibility criteria required, according to ACR, a minimum of 11 positive trigger points out of 18 areas and a normal thyroid-stimulating hormone level (bloodwork, <12mo). Ten female patients were enrolled, with an average age of 46.8±9.5 years (range, 28–62y) and a mean weight of 69.1±15.6kg (range, 49.9–104.3kg). The mean duration of fibromyalgia from the time of initial diagnosis was 8.11±3.2 years (range, 3–13y). Patients taking medication were not excluded from the study, and participants recorded their use of medication over the course of treatment.
Each patient signed an informed consent form and received a total of 15 sessions of mechanical massage once a week (35min/session). The mechanical massage technique consisted of a deep tissue mobilization provided by a medical device (Cellu M6).a This device is composed of a treatment chamber in which an aspiration system draws a skinfold between 2 motorized rollers that roll and unroll this fold.6 The treatment was administrated on the full body with particular focus on the tender point areas.
Evaluations
The principal outcome measure was the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), a validated disease-specific instrument.7 The first 10 FIQ items are scored to create the physical functioning score (PFS) and focus primarily on the patient’s ability to perform activities of daily living, such as walking and driving, and are scored from 0 (always able) to 3 (never able to do). The next 2 FIQ items ask the patient to circle the number of days in the past week when they felt good and the number of days where they missed work. The last 7 items—ability to do job (work difficulty), pain, fatigue, morning tiredness, stiffness, anxiety, and depression—are measured by 100-mm, anchored horizontal visual analog scales (VASs).
The second outcome was a physical examination performed by the investigator trained to evaluate fibromyalgia tender points. Each point was scored 0 to 4 (0, no pain; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, unbearable) and then summed to give a total tender pain score, which ranged from 0 to 72. The number of painful tender points was defined as the number of points with pain intensity greater than 0.
Both evaluations were performed at screening, midpoint of treatment (V7), and after completion of treatment (V15). At V15, patients were asked if the mechanical massage technique was helpful (no, not much, yes enough, a lot) and if they wanted to continue (evaluation of satisfaction).
Data Analysis
The statistical significance of the change in each parametric measure from baseline to 7 weeks and baseline to 15 weeks was examined using matched-pairs t tests. Change in medication use and satisfaction with treatment are described qualitatively.
Results
Nine patients completed the 15 sessions; 1 patient dropped out after the fourth session due to poor compliance. The sample size for analyses was 10 at screening, 9 at V7, and 9 at V15.
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
The mean PFS was 1.0±0.7 at screening, 0.7±0.5 at V7, and improved significantly (P<.009) to 0.4±0.4 at V15 (improvement from screening, 60%). The mean number of days when patients felt good during the past week (0–7) was 3.1±2.3 at screening and increased significantly to 5.9±0.9 at V15 (P=.003). The mean number of days patients missed work (0–7) was 0.9±1.2 at screening, 0.2±0.4 at V7 (P=.089), and 0.1±0.3 at V15 (P=.169). The FIQ VAS showed significant improvement after 15 sessions of mechanical massage, by 50% for all items (table 1).
Items (13–19) | Screening (N=10) | V7 (n=9) | P | V15 (n=9) | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pain | 6.1±2.7 | 3.8±2.5 | .036 | 3.1±1.8 | .007 |
Work difficulty | 5.2±2.8 | 3.8±2.6 | .089 | 2.8±1.8 | .013 |
Fatigue | 7.5±2.3 | 5.4±2.4 | .014 | 3.9±2.1 | <.001 |
Morning tiredness | 7.8±2.2 | 5.4±2.9 | .029 | 4.2±2.1 | .008 |
Stiffness | 6.9±2.5 | 5.4±2.0 | .057 | 3.7±2.1 | .004 |
Anxiety | 5.9±2.9 | 4.1±2.1 | .144 | 2.7±1.7 | .01 |
Depression | 4.3±3.0 | 3.0±1.7 | <.003 | 1.9±0.9 | <.034 |
Physical Examination
The mean pain score was 26.7±9.1 at screening; it reduced significantly to 14.8±10.4 at V7 (P<.001) and reduced again significantly to 10.22±8.6 at V15 (P<.001) (improvement from screening, 50% and 60%, respectively). The mean number of painful tender points was 15.5±2.1 at screening, decreased significantly to 10.0±5.0 at V7 (P=.002), and to 7.6±6.3 at V15 (P=.005) (improvement from screening, 36% and 50%, respectively).
Acceptability
Exactly 88.9% of the patients considered the treatment as “very” or “enough” helpful and wanted to continue.
Medications
Recorded medications were only nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and amitriptyline. At V15, 2 of the 6 patients using NSAIDs daily had reduced to sporadic evening usage; no change was observed in the use of amitriptyline.
Discussion
The primary outcome measure of this study was the FIQ, which is the only disability instrument designed and extensively validated for persons with fibromyalgia.8 All the parameters of FIQ, except for the number of days when patients missed work, significantly improved after 15 sessions of mechanical massage compared with screening: both the PFS and VAS changed in the range of 50%. In addition, the pain score and number of painful tender points decreased significantly from screening to V15 by 60% and 50%, respectively.
The literature on the effect of massage or behavioral-based therapy on fibromyalgia reports different fragmentary improvements with a lower magnitude.3, 9, 10 Massage is thought to affect outcome by both physiologic and psychologic mechanisms. Physiologic effects can be either mechanical or reflexive in nature.8
This pilot study had a number of significant methodologic weaknesses that should be kept in mind when interpreting the results. They include a small sample size (which can reduce the reliability of the findings), a lack of control for therapist attention, expectancy, and time effects (which can work to reduce pain report on their own), and a lack of control for the specific effects for the mechanical massage system used versus other massage strategies.
Conclusions
In this study, after 15 sessions of mechanical massage, we found a 50% improvement in the FIQ PFS, FIQ VAS, and pain scores. The findings suggest the possibility that the studied intervention might be associated with positive outcomes in women with fibromyalgia, and support the need for a controlled clinical trial on a larger population to determine its efficacy.
Suppliers
aLPG Systems SA, 30 Rue Dr Abel - BP 35, 26902 Valence Cedex 09, France.
Acknowledgment
We thank Hélène Pace-Soler of Axonal, Nanterre, France, for performing statistical analysis.
References
1Wolfe, F., Smythe, H.A., Yunus, M.B. et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia. Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum. 1990; 33: 160–172
2Carette, S., Bell, M.J., Reynolds, W.J. et al. Comparison of amitriptyline, cyclobenzaprine, and placebo in the treatment of fibromyalgia. A randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum. 1994; 37: 32–40
3Brattberg, G. Connective tissue massage in the treatment of fibromyalgia. Eur J Pain. 1999; 3: 235–244
4Offenbächer, M. and Stucki, G. Physical therapy in the treatment of fibromyalgia. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl.2000; 113: 78–85
5Millea, P.J. and Holloway, R.L. Treating fibromyalgia. Am Fam Physician. 2000; 62: 1575–1582 (1587)
6Watson, J., Fodor, P.B., Cutliffe, B., Sayah, D., and Shaw, W. Physiological effects of endermologie (a preliminary report) . Aesthetic Surg J. 1999; 19: 27–33
7Burckhardt, C.S., Clark, S.R., and Bennett, R.M. The fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (development and validation) . J Rheumatol. 1991; 18: 728–733
8Mannerkorpi, K. and Ekdahl, C. Assessment of functional limitation and disability in patients with fibromyalgia.Scand J Rheumatol. 1997; 26: 4–13
9Sunshine, W., Field, T., Quintino, O. et al. Fibromyalgia benefits from massage therapy and transcutaneous electrical stimulation. J Clin Rheumatol. 1996; 2: 18–22
10Creamer, P., Singh, B.B., Hochberg, M.C., and Berman, B.M. Sustained improvement produced by nonpharmacologic intervention in fibromyalgia (results of a pilot study) . Arthritis Care Res. 2000; 13: 198–204
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário