Mobilization with Movement Technique as an Adjunct to Conventional Physiotherapy in Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylits-A Comparative Study

College of Physiotherapy, PIMS, Loni-413736, Maharashtra, IndiaDeepak B Anap*, College of Physiotherapy, PIMS, Loni-413736, Maharashtra, IndiaMahendra L Shende and College of Physiotherapy, PIMS, Loni-413736, Maharashtra, IndiaSubhash Khatri

Keywords Lateral epicondylitis; Mobilization With Movement (MWM)

 Introduction
Lateral epicondylitis or tennis elbow is one of the most common lesions of the arm. This injury is a major challenge, as it is difficult to treat, prone to recurrence and may last for several weeks or months, with an average duration of a typical episode which has been reported to be between six months to two years [1]. The dominant arm is more commonly affected and the incidence of tennis elbow in practice is approximately 4 to 7 per 1000 patients per year with the annual incidence of 1-3% in the general population which increases to 19% in 30-60 years old population specifically and appears to be more long standing and severe in women [1,2]. A common presentation may consist of pain and tenderness over the lateral epicondyle of the humerus, the radial head, the fascia between and the origins of extensor muscles as well as radiating occasionally into the forearm. Many people complain of weak and painful grasp [3,4], eventually shaking hands along with which turning a door handle, picking up a milk carton or carrying a briefcase may cause severe pain around the epicondyle. The traditional view is that tennis elbow is initiated by macroscopic or microscopic tears at the common tendon of the wrist extensor muscles due to chronic overuse. As these tears attempt to unite, the healing surfaces are pulled apart with continued use of hand, resulting in self perpetuating and chronic inflammation. This theory was initially put forward by Dr. J Cyriax in 1936 and has since been widely accepted as the most plausible pathophysiological mechanism [5]. This inflammatory model also led to the use of the term “Epicondylitis” which was considered as an improvement over colloquial term “Tennis Elbow”. Yet this theory has never been substantiated and indeed has been refuted as early as the 1970s by Dr. R Nirschl, based on the histopathological examination of over 600 cases of chronic lateral epicondylalgia [6]. His studies consistently demonstrated that the affected tendon (usually the Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis [ECRB] tendon) was characterized by a dense population of fibroblasts disorganized and immature collagen and an absence of inflammatory cells. These findings are considered characteristic of a degenerative process which he called “Angiofibroblastic Hyperplasia”, now commonly known as tendinosis [7,8]. Numerous manual therapy procedures have been developed to assist in the management of lateral epicondylitis namely by Mills, Cyriax, Kalternborn, Menell, Stoddard, Hartman and Maitland. All of them have described various permutations of varus/extension direction manipulation applied to the lateral elbow. There is little appreciable research by Indian researchers, comparing two protocols in cases of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis. Hence, we have designed two treatment protocols to study their independent effects in treating Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis. The purpose of the present study was to examine effectiveness of Mobilization with Movement (MWM) along with conventional therapy in treating Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis.

Method
Subjects were 15 males and 25 females, from ages 30 to 55 years old (mean, 39.45 years). Their heights varied from 156 cm to 162 cm (mean, 158.5 cm) and weighed between 66.7 kg to 81.6 kg (mean, 76.3 kg). Patients who were included in the study were the ones with pain on lateral side of the elbow since the last 3 months which would be aggravated when pressure was applied on lateral humeral epicondyle and resisted wrist extension. Patients with severe neck or shoulder problems, persons on steroids/analgesics for the present complaints, prior surgeries of elbow, dislocations of joints, tendon ruptures or fracture in the area over prior year were excluded. The study was explained to all volunteers and each subject signed an informed consent. Ethical clearance for the study was obtained from the Ethical Committee, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences, Loni.

Procedure
Subjects were randomly assigned into one of the two groups A and B and which were assigned one the two study protocols without them being disclosed to the members of that group. Group A received the manual therapy protocol which included Mobilization with Movement (MWM) along with ultrasound, deep friction massage, stretching and strengthening for wrist extensors and wrist flexors for four sessions in a week for three weeks while Group B received conventional therapy protocol treatment which included therapeutic ultrasound, transverse friction massage and stretching and strengthening exercises. For the group A Mulligans mobilization with movement involved the application of lateral glide to the elbow joint which was sustained while an exercise, activity or movement was performed [9]. Mobilization belt was placed around the patient’s proximal forearm and across the therapist’s shoulder while the distal humerus was stabilized with one hand. Lateral glide was applied to the forearm through belt and sustained for about 5-10 sec. While the patient performed repeated wrist extension against manual resistance applied by the therapist’s hand. The lateral glide was released after the subject had achieved the pain free wrist extension. Six repetitions were performed with a 15 sec. rest interval between repetitions [9] (Figure 1). This was followed by pulsed ultrasound for 7^1/2 mins around lateral humeral epicondyle (Sonopuls). At a frequency of 1Mhz and a 20% duty cycle was given with an intensity of 2 w/cm² (Figure 2). Deep friction massage was applied for 10 mins on the antero-lateral aspect of the lateral epicondyle was located at the facet of the lateral epicondyle, where the Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis [ECRB] inserts, which is also the most common site of pain in patients with tennis elbow (Figure 3). When pain subsided, patients were instructed on strengthening and stretching of wrist extensors and flexors. Only when a patient was able to perform an exercise step, he or she was allowed to perform next step. Each exercise included 10 repetitions in a series of 2-3 steps. The exercise programs were performed 4 to 6 times daily at home. From group B conventional therapy protocol treatment which included therapeutic ultrasound, transverse friction massage and stretching and strengthening exercises was followed where the stretching and strengthening of wrist flexors and extensors was given as per the protocol described by Pienimaki et al. [10]. Dependent variables like Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Pain Free Grip Strength (PFGS) and Global measurement of Improvement Scale (Is) were recorded before and after the interventions for the patients in both the groups.