Physical therapy in peripheral facial paralysis: retrospective study
Márcia Regina GaranhaniI; Jefferson Rosa CardosoII; Alessandra de Mello Guides CapelliIII; Mara Claudia RibeiroIII
IMaster. Physical Therapist. Professor at the State University of Londrina
IIPhD. Physical Therapist, Professor at the State University of Londrina
IIISpecialist. Physical Therapist
IIPhD. Physical Therapist, Professor at the State University of Londrina
IIISpecialist. Physical Therapist
SUMMARY
Peripheral facial paralysis requires specialized treatment. Physical therapy aims at reestablishing facial movements. The aim of this study was to describe and to analyze physical therapy results for individuals with peripheral facial paralysis.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study.
METHOD: A retrospective study was carried out at the University Hospital, authorized by the Statistics and Medical File Services, from 1999 to 2003. Data are presented in descriptive form with mean and median values for numeric variables and frequency for categorical variables.
RESULTS: Twenty-three files were analyzed during four years. Females predominated and the average age was of 32.3 years (SD±16.5); 14 idiopathic and five trauma cases; 12 with total motor deficit and 11 with partial motor deficit; in the 12 cases that underwent final evaluation, seven had partial and five had total recovery. The physical therapy program used was kinesiotherapy and patient education.
CONCLUSION: In this study, individuals were similar to individuals in other populations. They were treated with kinesiotherapy, as suggested by the scientific literature and recovered.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study.
METHOD: A retrospective study was carried out at the University Hospital, authorized by the Statistics and Medical File Services, from 1999 to 2003. Data are presented in descriptive form with mean and median values for numeric variables and frequency for categorical variables.
RESULTS: Twenty-three files were analyzed during four years. Females predominated and the average age was of 32.3 years (SD±16.5); 14 idiopathic and five trauma cases; 12 with total motor deficit and 11 with partial motor deficit; in the 12 cases that underwent final evaluation, seven had partial and five had total recovery. The physical therapy program used was kinesiotherapy and patient education.
CONCLUSION: In this study, individuals were similar to individuals in other populations. They were treated with kinesiotherapy, as suggested by the scientific literature and recovered.
Keywords: exercises, bell’s palsy, facial paralysis, physical therapy techniques.
INTRODUCTION
Peripheral facial paralysis occurs from nervous input interruption at any of the facial nerve segments1,2. This may result in complete or partial paralysis of the facial muscles and may be associated to: tasting, salivation and tearing disorders, hyperacusia and hyposthesia of the external auditory canal2-4. In about 50% of the population affected by peripheral facial paralysis, the etiology is unknown. The first and foremost incidence is agnogenic, or Bell’s palsy, the second is trauma, among others2,5. High blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, viruses, pregnancy and breastfeeding are deemed associated conditions2,3,6,7.
The degree of facial nerve recovery depends on patient’s age, lesion type, nerve nurturing, neuromuscular involvement and therapy installed2,7,8. Facial nerve injury recovery may take weeks or up to four years1,3,4,7,8. Peripheral facial paralysis requires medical, physiotherapeutic and speech and hearing therapeutic approaches. Physical therapy is paramount, with the main goal of reestablishing muscle trophism, function and strength7-9. Approaches suggested in the literature are: Kinesiotherapy, massage and electro-thermotherapy, confirmed by random clinical assay and systematic review7,8,10,11.
The goal of the present investigation is to describe and retrospectively analyze physiotherapy results for individuals with peripheral facial paralysis.
METHOD
We carried out a retrospective study on the charts of patients from January of 1999 to June of 2003. This medical chart survey was authorized by the Statistical and Medical Service, after being approved by the Research Ethics Committee, # 231/05. We found 35 charts from individuals seen at the physical therapy ward with diagnosis of peripheral facial paralysis. Of these, nine were excluded for not having a medical diagnosis, and three for not having any physical therapy record.
We analyzed 23 charts as to age, gender, side affected, initial and final motor compromise, etiology, time span between diagnosis and physical therapy beginning, treatment time, number of sessions and resources utilized.
The data collected are presented in a descriptive fashion, using average (Standard Deviation) and median (quartiles) for numeric variables and frequency (absolute and relative) for categorical variables.
RESULTS
There was a predominance of females, 14 cases (60.9%). Average age was of 32.3 years (SD 16.5). There were 22 unilateral facial paralysis (95.7%), and 12 of those (52.2%) had their right side involved.
As to the facial paralysis etiology, we found 14 cases (60.9%) of agnogenic cause, five (21.7%), traumatic, three (13%) because of tumor and one case (4.3%), inflammatory. Of the individuals with agnogenic etiology, seven (50.0%) had total motor involvement and seven (50%) had partial motor involvement; of the traumatic etiology cases, two (40%) presented partial motor compromise and three (60%) had total compromise; of the tumor cases, two (66.7%) had partial motor involvement and one (33.3%) had total motor compromise; and the only case of inflammatory etiology presented total motor compromise.
In the initial evaluation, motor compromise was total in 12 cases (52.2%) and 11 had partial compromise (47.8%). Of the 23 charts analyzed, only 12 had the final individual’s assessment at the time of discharge. Such fact limited the analysis as to patient recovery after the physical therapy sessions. In these 12 cases analyzed we saw that seven (58%) had partial recovery (paresis) and five (41.7%) had total recovery. In analyzing initial and final compromise, all patients with total motor involvement evolved for either a normal or partial status. Nonetheless, only a few cases of paresis evolved to a normal status.
Time span between medical diagnosis and the onset of physical therapy was from two to 136 days, with a median of 15 days (seven and 22 days - 1st and 3rd quartiles). As to the duration of physical therapy, the patients remained within the 12 week median (eight and 21.1 - 1st and 3rd quartiles) in treatment with individual 45 minute sessions.
The most used therapeutic resources were: sensorial stimulation, propioceptive neuromuscular facilitation exercises and guidance (100%); massage (95.7%); stretching exercises (69.6%); pompage (26.1%) and electrotherapeutic (26.1%). Electrotherapy was carried out by means of a transcutaneous electrical stimulation, aiming at pain relief.
DISCUSSION
Peripheral facial paralysis causes and frequencies found in this study are in agreement with those found in the Brazilian literature3,8. According to Nakamura et al.12, the frequency of agnogenic facial paralysis varies from 62% to 93% of the cases. However, a Colombian study showed a higher rate of traumatic facial paralysis when compared to Bell’s palsy13. According to Vasconcelos2, the second highest incidence of peripheral facial paralysis is traumatic in origin, and it may occur as a consequence to fractures in facial bones, such as it happens in head injuries.
Approximately one third of the patients end up with significant cosmetic or functional sequelae such as: oral dysfunction, muscle contractures, nasal obstruction, dysgeusia, dysesthesia, syncinesis and hemifacial spasms3. Often times, the complete lesion recovery is prevented because of syncinesis.4,7,8 Syncinesis may be related to physical therapy being applied without supervision and electrostimulation14. This is a sequela related to facial nuclear hyperexcitability, or the aberrant regeneration of nervous fibers1. The present investigation showed that, among the 12 cases with final evaluation, seven presented with motor sequelae and only one had syncinesis.
When we compare etiology to motor recovery (n=12), we noticed total recoveries in the cases of agnogenic etiology (60%) and traumatic (40%). In a study involving 140 patients with agnogenic facial paralysis, Wolf15reported a satisfactory recovery in 82.1% of the patients.
Although it is common to have a worsening of symptoms in the first 48 hours, most patients evolved to recovery within some weeks. Nonetheless, when there is evidence of denervation after 10 days, there may be a delay in recovery onset (three months in average)4,7. Ribeiro8 stated that the average time for facial nerve recovery may be from 15 days to four years. Cohen16 observed that, in 95 pregnant women, complete recovery of Bell’s palsy happened in 56 patients (58.9%) within four months or less. In a study involving 36 patients with peripheral facial paralysis and using Kinesiotherapy, partial recovery was seen in 83.3% of the patients after 15 days, and total recovery in 63.8%, after 30 days of physiotherapy17. The participants in this study remained in the 12 week treatment median, and this may mean early discharge or treatment abandonment; three remained for more than one year and only one was followed up for four years.
Studies advocate stimulation with quick massage and facial movement exercises in order to improve symmetry. In an international meeting held two decades ago, it had been already advocated the following up of peripheral facial paralysis patients with exercises, massage, electrotherapy and biofeedback7,8,12,17,18. Cronin & Steenerson14 propose biofeedback by surface electromyography. Results show an improvement in facial symmetry and in syncinesis in 24 patients.
Neuromuscular training for facial movement exercises are used in order to improve facial symmetry9,4. The main physical therapy resources employed in the patients of the present study were: kinesiotherapy, massotherapy, cryotherapy and electrotherapy. Kinesiotherapy with neuromuscular facilitation and sensory stimulation were used in all interventions. The results attained in facial training may be explained by the theory of nervous system plasticity19.
Of the 23 charts analyzed initially, only three patients received electrotherapy associated to kinesiotherapy for pain control, and not neuromuscular electrostimulation. The neuromuscular electrostimulation program is able to partially revert motor deficit and the sequelae of peripheral facial paralysis, when combined with a specific exercises program. A narrative and systematic review of the literature show benefits of using classical electrostimulation and biofeedback; and concluded that more studies are necessary in order to reach the specific parameters of utilization and evaluation of these benefits, in order to truly prove their effectiveness11,18. A comparative study involving 49 patients with Bell’s palsy showed a fast and complete recovery in 77 patients treated by neuromuscular electrostimulation, compared to 72 patients treated only with prednisone20. Nonetheless, electrotherapy may be responsible for an increase in tetany and hypertonia that cause syncinesis. This treatment modality has been abandoned in favor of analytical muscular work and muscle stretching exercieses9-14.
All the patients in the present study were instructed as to the care they should take in domestic activities. Basically, such education aims at providing patients with information, prevent symptom recurrence and to cause a change in the behavior of these individuals7. In this sense, it significantly favors changes in health care, since it makes it easier for the affected individual to accept responsibility for his/her treatment. 21.
LIMITATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
The records of the cases hereby presented are incomplete and not standardized. It is fundamental to insert in the physical therapy department protocols that may come to facilitate the recording of data from individuals with facial paralysis referred for treatment, such as: medical treatment employed, initial and final motor evaluation, resources selected, treatment report, thus allowing for more analytical studies.
The many resources used in the physical therapy of individuals with facial paralysis cause neuromotor recoveries. However, we need studies that show the true effectiveness of these resources, with randomized clinical trials, aiming at enhancing the clinical decisions of physical therapists.
CONCLUSION
The present investigation showed that the characteristics of individuals with facial paralysis seen at the physical therapy ward are similar to those from other populations. They had an improvement in their initial symptoms after treatment employing kinesiotherapy, as suggested by clinical practice and the scientific literature.
REFERENCES
1. Adams RD. Neurologia. Rio de Janeiro: McGraw-Hill; 1998. [ Links ]
2. Vasconcelos BEC, Dias E, Dantas WRM, Barros ES, Monteiro GQM. Paralisia facial periférica traumática. Rev Cir Traumat Buco-Maxilo-Facial 2001;1:13-20. [ Links ]
3. Valença MM, Valença LPAA, Lima MCM. Paralisia facial periférica idiopática de Bell: a propósito de 180 casos. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2001;59:234-42. [ Links ]
4. Valença MM, Valença LPAA. Nervo facial: aspectos anatômicos e semiológicos. Neurobiol 1999;62:77-84. [ Links ]
5. Gonçalvez-Coelho TDG, Pinheiro CND, Ferraz EVP, Affonso Neto JL. Clusters of Bells palsy. Arp Neuropsiquiatr 1997;55:722-7. [ Links ]
6. Brandenburg NA, Annegers JF. Incidence and risk factors for Bell’s palsy in Laredo, Texas: 1974-1982. Neuroepidemiology 1993;12:313-25. [ Links ]
7. Gomez MVSG, Vasconcelos LGE, Moraes MFBB. Trabalho miofuncional na paralisia facial. Arq Fund Otorrinolaringol 1999;3:1-5. [ Links ]
8. Ribeiro EC, Cassol M. Enfoque fisioterápico e fonoaudiólogo na paralisia facial periférica. Arq Fund Otorrinolaringol 1999;3:46-52. [ Links ]
9. Beurskens CH, Heymans PG. Physiotherapy in patients with facial nerve paresis: description of outcomes. Am J Otolaryngol 2004;25:394-400. [ Links ]
10. Beurskeens CHG e Heymans PG Positive effects of mime therapy on sequelae of facial paralysis: stiffness, lip mobility, and social and physical aspects of facial disability. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:677-81. [ Links ]
11. Quinn R, Cramp F. The efficacy of electrotherapy for Bell’s palsy: a systematic review. Phys Ther Rev 2003;8:151-64. [ Links ]
12. Nakamura K, Toda N, Sakamari K, Takeda N. Biofeedback rehabilitation for prevention of synkinesis after facial palsy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;128:539-43. [ Links ]
13. Gutiérrez OA, Mejia LJ. Paralisis facial periférica: prevalencia abril 1996 a julio 1997 em el Hospital Universitario La Samanaritana. Acta Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello 1999;27:85-8. [ Links ]
14. Cronin GW, Steenerson RL. The effectiveness of neuromuscular facial retraining combined whit electromyography in facial paralysis rehabilitation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;128:534-8. [ Links ]
15. Wolf MR. Idiopathic facial paralysis. HNO 1998;46:786-98. [ Links ]
16. Cohen YMG, Lavie O, Granovsky S, Aboulafia Y, Diamant Y. Bell palsy complication pregnancy: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2000;55:184-8. [ Links ]
17. Gómez-Benitez DA, Rivas JAC, Garcia EF, Penã D, Maritza S, Torres LM, Pantaleon Z. Terapia física en una población de pacientes con parálisis facial periférica. Rev Med Domin 1995;56:22-4. [ Links ]
18. Roma SM, Rodt VV. Paralisis facial periférica y terapia física: puesta al dia. Kinesiologia 2002;68:87-91. [ Links ]
19. Cohen H. Neurociência para fisioterapeutas. 2ª ed. São Paulo: Manole; 2001. [ Links ]
20. Flores FP, Zazueta MR, Garcia HL. Tratamiento de la paralisis facial periférica idiopática: terapia física versus prednisona. Rev Med IMSS 1998;36:217-21. [ Links ]
21. Gahimer JE, Domholdt E. Amount of patient education in physical therapy practice and perceived effects. Phys Ther 1996;76:1089-96. [ Links ]
22. Diels JH, Combs D. Neuromuscular retraining for facial paralysis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1997;30:727-43. [ Links ]
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário