| PHYSIOTHERAPY AND COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES/ FISIOTERAPIA

The Cost-Effectiveness of Yoga for Preventing and Reducing Back Pain at Work: Trial Protocol

*Ned Hartfiel^1, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards¹ and Ceri Phillips²**
¹Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, UK
²Swansea University, UK

Keywords

Yoga; Back pain; Work place; Occupational health

Background Back pain is one of the major factors associated with sickness absence, costing British industry an estimated £14 billion per year [1]. The Office for National Statistics reported that musculoskeletal conditions, including back and neck pain, was the main cause of sickness absence in 2013 with a total of 31 million days lost [2]. Research indicates that few workplace interventions are effective for preventing and reducing back pain [3]. Group exercise programmes, however, have been shown to have a positive effect on the health of employees [4] and are reported to be more cost-effective than oneto- one spinal manipulation treatments provided by physiotherapists, chiropractors and osteopaths [5]. Yoga is a promising from of group exercise, which includes physical activity, breathing exercises, relaxation techniques and meditation practices to enhance mindfulness and mind-body awareness [6]. Recent evidence suggests that yoga for reducing back pain can be effective [7,8], and cost-effective from a societal perspective [9]. Although there are several published RCTs investigating the effectiveness of yoga delivered in workplace settings [10-15], none have examined whether yoga is cost-effective from the perspective of the employer. The purpose of this study is to measure the financial return of a workplace yoga programme for preventing and reducing back pain - one of the major causes of sickness absence in the UK.

Trial Objectives The primary objectives of this study are to: 1) Design and deliver a yoga-based back care programme to employees of all ages and fitness levels; 2) Conduct an RCT investigating the effectiveness and costeffectiveness of a workplace yoga programme for preventing and reducing back pain; 3) Investigate the factors that influence the implementation and impact of a yoga programme at work.

Methods Trial design This study will be a multi-site pragmatic RCT offered to NHS employees from three hospital sites. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive either an eight-week yoga programme or an educational programme consisting of The Back Book and How to Manage Stress. Six qualified yoga instructors will be selected to deliver the eight week programme.

Recruitment and participants This study will be open to all NHS staff, with and without back pain, between 18 – 65 years of age and who are able to attend one yoga class per week. The classes will be offered after work, from 5.30 – 6.30 pm at the three different hospital locations. The NHS Occupational Health and Wellbeing Unit will recruit employees via an e-newsletter and an all-staff e-mail which will explain the details of the trial. Interested NHS staff members will then receive a participant information sheet, a consent form and a health questionnaire. The participation information sheet will invite participants allocated to the yoga group to attend one 60 minute yoga class each week and to practice at home for 20 minutes, 3x per week using a DVD and illustrated booklet. Attendance at the yoga classes and adherence to home practice will be monitored weekly. The health questionnaire will ask participants for demographic information including whether they are full- or part-time employees, their use of the health service, changes in medication, and any other health conditions (e.g., recent surgery, pregnancy, spinal disc problems, etc) that could prevent safe participation in the yoga programme. The health questionnaire will also include valid and reliable outcome measures for collecting baseline data on back pain, wellbeing, quality of life, mood and resilience.

Exclusion criteria, site preference and randomisation To insure safety and prevent bias, participants who are currently experiencing the following conditions will be excluded from this study: 1) pregnancy; 2) recent spinal disc problems or major surgery; 3) practicing yoga or yoga-related activities (such as pilates or tai chi); 4) leaving the NHS within six months. Health questionnaires will be reviewed by research team members, including physiotherapists and yoga instructors, who will assess the risk and eligibility of participants. Eligible participants will be randomised to either the yoga programme or the education programme. An equal allocation of 1:1 will be used to ensure balance in the overall number of participants in the yoga and education groups. Randomisation will be conducted by the North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trial in Health (NWORTH). After randomisation, the NHS Occupational Health and Wellbeing Unit will inform participants of their group allocation.

Sample size A sample size calculation was performed which determined that a minimum of 116 participants will be needed for this study. This calculation was based on a 2012 pilot study published in Occupational Medicine entitled "yoga for reducing perceived stress and back pain at work” [10]. This study found that a change in RMDQ scores of 1.17 was statistically significant for employees with little disability, and that the standard deviation of the difference in change scores was calculated to be 1.95 points resulting in an effect size calculation of 0.76. Using this effect size calculation, Cohen's power of analysis test [16] and assuming 80% power, the current study will require a total sample size of 87 complete cases. If we assume a 25% attrition rate, then we will need to recruit 116 participants for this study.

Interventions The yoga intervention will include an eight-week programme consisting of sixty minute yoga classes offered at the workplace, plus a back care DVD and an illustrated yoga booklet for home practice. The back care programme taught in this study was developed by a panel of physiotherapists, osteopaths and senior Dru Yoga instructors. This panel agreed on a progressive programme of yoga techniques, which could be easily learned in a sixty minute class setting at the workplace and then practised at home by participants. Dru Yoga was the chosen intervention because it is a safe and therapeutic form of yoga that can be practised by most people [17]. Dru Yoga is characterised by graceful movements, directed breathing, and relaxation methods that include affirmation and visualisation techniques. The sixty minute Dru Yoga classes will be divided into four stages: activation exercises, energy block release sequences, back care postures and relaxation techniques. The participants allocated to the education group will receive two evidence-based booklets (approximately 20 pages each): The Back Book [18] and How to Manage Stress [19]. Produced by The Stationery Office, The Back Book presents information about how to prevent back pain. How to Manage Stress is distributed by Mind, one of the leading mental health charities in the UK. At the conclusion of this study, the education group will also receive a back care DVD, an illustrated yoga booklet, and a four week series of yoga classes.

Outcome measures The health questionnaire, completed by all participants in both groups before randomisation, will contain valid and reliable scales for measuring back pain, wellbeing, quality of life, mood and resilience. Participants in both the yoga and education groups will complete the health questionnaire at baseline, at eight weeks, and at 6 months. The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) will be the primary outcome measure for back pain [20]. The RMDQ has been found to be sensitive to change, reliable and valid [21]. Secondary measures will include the Keele STarT Back Screening Tool [22], the WHO-5 wellbeing scale [23], the Exercise-Induced Feeling Inventory (EFI) to measure mood [24], and the Resilience Scale (RS-14) [25]. The economic evaluation will include both a return-on-investment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Return-on-investment from the employer perspective will be completed by obtaining sickness absence data from the NHS Electronic Staff Records (ESRs) for all participants in our study during the eight week intervention and six month follow up period. Cost-effectiveness analysis will be calculated using the EQ5D- 5L [26] and ICECAP-A [27] for both groups. For the yoga group, class attendance and home practice records will measure adherence to the protocol. Qualitative data will be collected from twenty-minute group interviews with a convenience sample of yoga participants at each of the three hospital sites. In addition, interviews with a purposive sample of yoga instructors and hospital administrators will be conducted to provide insights into how the trial was delivered and how participants experienced receiving the intervention. These insights into the context, dosage, fidelity and implementation will help inform the future delivery of yoga programmes at work.

Bias and adverse events Although randomisation will help eliminate selection bias, participants who are randomised to the education group may withdraw from the study, especially if yoga is their preferred intervention. To minimise attrition bias, incentives will be provided to the education group for completing the questionnaires at eight weeks and at six months. At eight weeks, the education group will be offered a free yoga mat for completing the end-programme questionnaire. At six months, the education group will receive a four week series of yoga classes, a back care DVD and an illustrated yoga booklet. In addition to providing incentives, the NHS Office of Occupational Health and Wellbeing will send reminder e-mails to all participants in both groups who fail to complete questionnaires. If participants withdraw from the study, the research team will attempt to collect information on their reasons for leaving and record any adverse events due to practising yoga. Additional information on adverse effects due to practising yoga will be collected during the focus group interviews with yoga participants after the completion of the eight-week programme.

Analysis Statistical and economic analysis plan An intention-to-treat analysis of variance (ANOVA) approach will be used to determine the effectiveness of the yoga programme for reducing back pain and improving wellbeing. Multiple linear regressions will be used when appropriate. Significance will be assessed at p < 0.05 for the RMDQ, Keele STarT, WHO-5, EFI, and RS-14 The effect of the yoga intervention on all domains will be corrected using a false discovery rate (FDR) approach (Q<0.05) [28]. Primary and secondary outcome measure scores will be summarised descriptively (i.e. mean, SD, median, minimum and maximum) at baseline, eight weeks (primary end point) and six months for both the yoga and education groups. The difference in mean scores between the yoga and education groups at eight weeks and six months (and the corresponding 95% confidence interval) will be determined. The economic analysis plan will include a return-on-investment (ROI) analysis from the perspective of the employer and a costeffectiveness analysis (CEA) from a societal perspective.

Return-on-investment analysis The ROI analysis will consider only the costs relevant to the employer, such as the cost of the intervention and the savings from the number of sickness absence days reduced. Costs will be defined as the costs for setting up and delivering the eight week yoga programme. The benefits will be defined as the difference in the absenteeism costs due to back pain between the yoga and education groups.

Cost-effectiveness analysis The CEA will measure the costs and benefits of the yoga group and the education group. Mean differences in total costs and benefits between the yoga and education groups at eight weeks and at the six month follow-up period will be calculated. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) will be determined by dividing the difference in total costs by the difference in total benefits for both groups. Subgroup analysis considering the degree of back pain at baseline, the adherence to the yoga programme, and the location of the programme will also be conducted.

Measurement of costs The health questionnaires completed by participants at baseline, eight weeks and six months will collect data on “health service use”. This data will include visits to GPs, practice nurses, and other health professionals (e.g. physiotherapists). The data will be analysed as to whether it is related to back pain or not. In order to estimate total costs, unit costs will be assigned for each visit to a health care professional. Unit costs will be obtained from national published sources such as the Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU) [29] and the NHS Reference Cost 2012-13 [30].

Measurement of benefit The EQ5D-5L profiles for each participant will be scored using a “crosswalk” between the EQ5D-3L value sets and the new EQ5D-5L. Mean scores and measures of dispersion will be calculated for both groups. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) will be calculated using area under the curve analysis, weighting quantity of life (years) by quality of life (weighted health utility index) [31].

Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis A summary measure of the uncertainty of costs and effects will be presented using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEAC). The CEAC will show a range of probabilities of an intervention being cost-effectiveness at different ceiling thresholds (i.e. maximum amount that decision makers are willing to pay for a unit of benefit). To test the robustness of the results, a series of sensitivity analyses will be conducted to explore the variability in estimating cost-effectiveness.

Qualitative analysis Qualitative thematic analysis of interviews with yoga participants will be aim to identify the elements of satisfaction or dissatisfaction, and the degree of impact of the yoga programme. Interviews will be digitally recorded, subject to the permission of each participant, and where appropriate transcribed verbatim. Anonymous direct quotations will be used when appropriate to describe key findings.

Ethical Review Ethical approval for this trial was obtained from the School of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences at Bangor University. R&D approval was granted by a NHS Internal Review Panel.

Acknowledgements The trial is funded by the Welsh Health Economics Support Services.

References